The Diaspora and the Cold War

15/07/2007 Armen BAGHDASARYAN

A few days ago, tourism in Armenia drastically increased. About 250 young people from 25 foreign countries have arrived in Yerevan to participate in the pan-Armenian international conference. The organizer was the chair of the International Armenian Congress (more correctly the Armenian union in Russia), Ara Abrahamyan. The man has done a good thing to unite the Armenians living in different corners of the world. These young people have socialized, discussed the challenges of the 21st century, visited Tsitsernakaberd, Garni-Geghard… Shortly said, it was all good.

The conference even had a slogan. It approximately sounded this way: “We are strong when we are together.” In general, strength is a good thing. You just need to know what to use it on. For example, the little boy eats a lot of dinner to grow up to beat up the naughty boy of the neighborhood; the weightlifter gets strong to lift huge weights, etc. What issues are the young people going to solve after they unite? Unfortunately, this question didn’t get a concrete and satisfactory answer during the conference. Of course, many senseless ideas were heard. For example, withstand the challenges of the 21st century, resolution of the Karabakh conflict on our behalf, becoming ambassadors of Armenian interests in the countries where the young people live, etc.

But don’t rush to underestimate the activities of the Armenians of the Diaspora. There were extremely concrete recommendations on how to resist the challenges of the 21st century and how to maintain one’s Armenian identity. For example, in one of the sections they were suggesting to persistently fight against globalization, and in this framework prohibit the sale of Coca-Cola, potato chips and American films. We of course understand how dangerous potato chips are for our national identity and how Coca Cola deforms the genetic code of our biblical nation, but nevertheless it’s strange when, for instance, a young man from Orenbourg or Beirut gives himself the right to decide what the local Armenians must or must not eat in the Republic of Armenia. Although, on the other hand, the intentions of the crusaders against this American product are quite understandable. Ara Abrahamyan wasn’t able to include the US Armenian community in his Congress. Besides, he is a Russian citizen (and not a regular citizen), and at present the relations between Russia and the US are quite tense. Simply said, tensions between the two countries are gradually increasing, more and more resembling the cold war period.

And a question arises. Why is it necessary for the Armenian Diaspora to divide into two parts as well? Why does one part of the Armenian Diaspora have to be pro-Russian and the other part pro-American? We understand that the famous Armenian in Russia and the major businessman from Western countries all have to somehow confirm their interests and put their stamp on the policies of those countries. Can’t we keep the Armenian Diaspora away from this process?

Theoretically, this opportunity exists. For that, we only need one thing. Armenia as a country must clearly define its state interests and guide itself exclusively by its state values and interests. This will enable the Diaspora to unite around those interests and understand exactly what they need to do. But as the definition of state interests is not used any more and instead the term “national interests of the Armenian people” is used, the Diaspora really gets confused. That’s the reason some of them are offering to ban the sale of Coca Cola and some days others may suggest to ban showing Russian soap operas in Armenia or the sale of vodka, etc. It’s not known how Armenia can possibly benefit from it. The important thing is to be together and strong.